Yes, the district considers free and open-source software when appropriate, but cost is only one factor in decision-making; security, support, compliance, sustainability, and staff capacity are equally critical. In some cases, open-source solutions can increase long-term costs if they require significant internal support or introduce operational or security risks that outweigh licensing savings. Where open-source tools meet district requirements and can be supported responsibly, they are used; where they do not, the district prioritizes stability, accountability, and reliability. Many district technology systems are integrated platforms in which hardware and software are designed to work together and require ongoing licensing and support, particularly for phone, security, and wireless infrastructure. Additionally, core technology functions across school districts are governed by safety, operational, and compliance requirements, leading districts to rely on established platforms for systems such as student information, communications, visitor management, and device safety to ensure reliability, interoperability, and continuity of service.